![one million song mp3 one million song mp3](https://images.hungama.com/c/1/a85/01d/68644898/68644898_300x300.jpg)
#One million song mp3 trial#
The massive damage award, which increased from $9,250 per song in the first trial to $80,000, might sounds like a "win," but will probably stoke grassroots anger against the industry's campaign.
![one million song mp3 one million song mp3](https://www.morexlusive.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Camila-Cabello-Million-To-One-scaled-1.jpeg)
The recording industry lawyers, though clearly pleased, had no desire to showboat this one. it's like squeezing blood from a turnip." "They did their job," she said, "I'm not going to hold it against them." She added, though, that the recording industry would never collect the money. He told reporters that when he first heard the $80,000 per song damage award, he was "angry about it" and said he had been convinced that any liability finding would have been for the minimum amount of $750 per song.Īs for Thomas-Rasset, she appeared shaken by the verdict but didn't blame the jury. Kiwi Camara, Thomas-Rasset's lead attorney, spoke briefly after the trial. As the dollar amount was read in court, Thomas-Rasset gasped and her eyes widened. The jury awarded the labels damages totaling a whopping $1.92 million. In a repeat of the verdict from her first federal trial, Thomas-Rasset was found liable for willfully infringing all 24 copyrights controlled by the four major record labels at issue in the case. A new lawyer, a new jury, and a new trial were not enough to save Jammie Thomas-Rasset.